More palitable for the public? |
|
|
Material Existence is Suffering Only? |
Bg 13.29 Original Version |
The living entity, by accepting his material existence as just so much suffering, can become situated in his spiritual existence. |
|
|
Revised & Enlarged Version |
The living entity, by accepting his material existence, has become situated differently than in his spiritual existence. |
|
|
|
Fighting for Krishna? |
Bg 3.20 Original Version |
…Being a great devotee of the Lord, he was transcendentally situated, but because he was the king of Mithila (a subdivision of Behar province in India), he had to teach his subjects how to fight righteously in battle. He and his subjects fought to teach people in general that violence is also necessary in a situation where good arguments fail. |
|
|
Revised & Enlarged Version |
…Being a great devotee of the Lord, he was transcendentally situated, but because he was the king of Mithila (a subdivision of Bihar province in India), he had to teach his subjects how to perform prescribed duties. Lord Krsna and Arjuna, the Lord’s eternal friend, had no need to fight in the Battle of Kuruksetra, but they fought to teach people in general that violence is also necessary in a situation where good arguments fail. |
|
|
|
Sacrificing the Material Body For the Sake of Religion? |
Bg 2.18 Original Version |
…Arjuna was advised to fight and to sacrifice the material body for the cause of religion. |
|
|
Revised & Enlarged Version |
…Arjuna was advised to fight and not sacrifice the cause of religion for material, bodily considerations. |
|
|
|
The Soft Line for Ksatriyas |
Bg 16.1 Original Version |
The word tejas used here is meant for the ksatriyas. The ksatriyas should always be very strong to be able to give protection to the weak. They should not pose themselves as nonviolent. If violence is required, they must exhibit it. |
|
|
Revised & Enlarged Version |
The word tejas used here is meant for the ksatriyas. The ksatriyas should always be very strong to be able to give protection to the weak. They should not pose themselves as nonviolent. If violence is required, they must exhibit it. But a person who is able to curb down his enemy may under certain conditions show forgiveness. He may excuse minor offenses. |
|
|
|
Devotees are Liberated and Their Minds are Peaceful? |
Bg 6.27 Original Version |
The yogi whose mind is fixed on Me verily attains the highest happiness. By virtue of his identity with Brahman, he is liberated; his mind is peaceful, his passions are quieted, and he is freed from sin. |
|
|
Revised & Enlarged Version |
The yogi whose mind is fixed on Me verily attains the highest perfection of transcendental happiness. He is beyond the mode of passion, he realizes his qualitative identity with the Supreme, and thus he is freed from all reactions to past deeds. |
|
|
|
Brahmacaris Are Austere and Simple? |
Bg 16.1 Original Version |
Then svadhyaya, Vedic study, and tapas, austerity, and arjavam, gentleness or simplicity, are meant for brahmacarya or student life. Brahmacaris should have no connection with women; they should live a life of celibacy and engage the mind in the study of Vedic literature for cultivation of spiritual knowledge. This is called svadhyaya. |
|
|
Revised & Enlarged Version |
Then svadhyaya, Vedic study is meant for brahmacarya or student life. Brahmacaris should have no connection with women; they should live a life of celibacy and engage the mind in the study of Vedic literature for cultivation of spiritual knowledge. This is called svadhyaya. |
|
|
|
“Faithfulness” is one of the Opulences of a Woman? |
Bg 10.34 Original Version |
I am all-devouring death, and I am the generator of all things yet to be. Among women I am fame, fortune, speech, memory, intelligence, faithfulness and patience. |
|
|
Revised & Enlarged Version |
I am all-devouring death, and I am the generating principle of all that is yet to be. Among women I am fame, fortune, fine speech, memory, intelligence, steadfastness and patience. |
|
|
|
Devotees Should Live Simply? |
Bg 16.1 Original Version |
As far as simplicity is concerned, not only should a particular order of life follow this principle, but every member, be he in the brahmacari asrama, or grhastha asrama, or vanaprastha asrama or sannyasa asrama. One must live very simply. |
|
|
Revised & Enlarged Version |
As far as the brahminical quality of simplicity is concerned, not only should a particular order of life follow this principle, but every member, be he in the brahmacari asrama, grhastha asrama, or vanaprastha asrama or sannyasa asrama. One should be very simple and straightforward. |
|
Hare Krishna!
Thankyou for this excellent work showing the changes made by the bogus-iskcon…the other day I had a controverse with the former temple-president in Finland, he claims iskcon has made Srila Prabhupada’s books better, because before they were full of type writing mistakes and other similar…I will not take his excuse no way. Besides the original Bhagavad-Gita As It Is is now undergoing translation to Finnish language here in Finland, it’s a friend of mine who is doing the work. Best regards, Harinamananda das, Finland
There are some very major changes to the purports, and it is wrong! I became familiar with ISKCON at the age of 40, and I like to observe. I have seen a lot of devotees that are so smart, but a smugness and pride has overcome that intelligence. One cannot say he worships God and play him at the same time. Thank you for your devotion and dedication to Srila Prabhupada.
I feel so badly that there is such a tear in the society. Some people…we all…have been hurt. I remember having the original Gita at a book study, and others did also, and when we were to turn to a certain page, the pages didn’t add up to the new edition, and it caused a stir, and the class was disrupted, and the original book was no longer allowed.
It doesn’t have to be this was, and it shouldn’t. All the the different copies of the book should be allowed at the temple, but especially the original. Srila Prabhupada was so proud to have authenticated these great books so that if people questioned, there would be no mistake.
We all love Prabhupada. Can we please just think of him and back down on the issue a little? Please.
Thank you for this!
This is a great service, the original version should become again the standard version.
Looking at these changes I can clearly see where several faults from ISKCON arised from.
Hari Om Tat Sat!
I am a university-trained translator and I am aghast at the nature of some of these translations; certainly at the nature of the translations above.
The changes are significant, and they change and/or omit the meanings. Steps have been taken that proofreaders and translators are taught not to take!
Srila PRABHUPADA” Why you are, I mean to say, killing others and yourself by interpreting Bhagavad-gītā?”
Srila Prabhupada….”So if you read Bhagavad-gītā as it is, that is mad-āśrayaḥ. But if you interpret Bhagavad-gītā according to your rascal imagination, that is not Bhagavad-gītā. Therefore it is called mad-āśrayaḥ, “under My protection, as I am …” We are therefore presenting Bhagavad-gītā as it is. We do not change. Why should you change? What right you have got to change? If Bhagavad-gītā is a book of authority, and if I make my own interpretation, then where is the authority? Can you change the lawbook according to your interpretation? Then what is the meaning of that lawbook? That is not lawbook. You cannot change. Similarly, if you accept Bhagavad-gītā as the book of authority, you cannot change the meaning. That is not allowed. What right? If you have got some opinion, if you have got some philosophy, you can write in your own book. Why you are, I mean to say, killing others and yourself by interpreting Bhagavad-gītā? You give your own thesis in a different way. But these people, they take advantage of the popularity of Bhagavad-gītā and interpret in a different way according to their own whims. Therefore people do not understand what is Kṛṣṇa. That is the difficulty. And the purpose of Bhagavad-gītā is to understand Kṛṣṇa. And all the so-called scholars’ and politicians’ commentary is to banish Kṛṣṇa or to kill Kṛṣṇa—the Kaṁsa’s policy. The Kaṁsa was always thinking of Kṛṣṇa, how to kill Him. This is called demonic endeavor. So that will not help you.”
Srila Prabhupada’s Lecture : Bhagavad-gita 7.1 — Hyderabad, April 27, 1974
Hi, I’m so sad about all this. I want to read the original Bhagabad Gita As It Is. Any link? Thanks and Hare Krsna !!!
yes:
http://www.asitis.com
and
http://www.prabhupadabooks.com